For many people, receiving a mental health diagnosis brings mixed emotions. There can be relief from a sense that you finally understand what’s going on. There can also be fear, confusion, anger, or grief. Some people feel seen for the first time, while others may feel reduced to a label that doesn’t quite fit.
These reactions make sense. Mental health diagnoses are powerful tools, but they are not neutral, and they are not complete stories. Understanding what a diagnosis is, what it isn’t, and how it’s used matters deeply for healing.
From an existential therapy perspective, diagnoses are best understood not as verdicts, but as meaning-making frameworks. They are tools that have the potential to deepen understanding for individuals and support their healing.
At a basic level, a diagnosis is a shared clinical language. It helps professionals communicate, guides treatment planning, and allows people to access care, insurance coverage, and accommodations. For many, it offers validation, relief from years of self-blame, and more clarity about their needs.
However, diagnoses are also limited by design. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR) itself acknowledges that diagnoses are descriptive categories, not explanations of cause or meaning (American Psychiatric Association, 2022). They describe patterns of distress that tend to cluster together. They do not explain why those patterns developed in a specific person, within a particular life.
A diagnosis is not:
Harm can occur when diagnoses are mistaken for identity or viewed as having absolute outcomes.
Used with care, diagnoses can provide orientation. They can help people recognize patterns, feel less alone, and find language for experiences that once felt chaotic or unspeakable. Naming experiences can reduce shame and increase engagement in treatment when the diagnosis is offered collaboratively and respectfully.
Diagnoses can also:
A mental health diagnosis can function like a map. It doesn’t tell you who you are, but it can help you understand where you are, how you function, and what supports you need.

Diagnoses themselves aren’t negative. However, harm can occur when they are treated as fixed truths rather than evolving tools.
One common example of this is the pathologizing of trauma. Many symptoms, such as hypervigilance, emotional numbing, dissociation, and difficulty trusting, are understandable responses to chronic stress or trauma. When these are diagnosed as a disorder without adequate attention to trauma history, people can internalize the belief that something is “wrong” with them, rather than recognizing that their nervous system adapted to survive (van der Kolk, 2014).
Another harm occurs when diagnosing obscure neurodivergence. Autistic traits, ADHD patterns, sensory sensitivity, or differences in emotional processing are often framed solely as deficits. In reality, distress frequently arises from environments that are invalidating, overstimulating, or rigid. It’s important to distinguish between intrinsic traits and stress responses shaped by social exclusion (Kapp, 2020).
In these cases, the diagnosis may accurately describe distress, but misunderstand its source.
Rather than asking whether diagnoses are good or bad, a more helpful question is: How are they being used, and in whose service?
Diagnoses are most helpful when they:
They become harmful when they:
From an existential perspective, suffering is something to be understood. Diagnoses can be used to support that understanding, not replace it.
Existential therapy invites a different relationship with diagnosis. Instead of asking “What’s wrong with me?”, the question becomes: “What has my suffering been responding to?”
Seen this way, diagnoses are lenses, not identities. They can help illuminate patterns while still honoring the complexity of a life shaped by lived experience, relationships, culture, trauma, values, and choice.
For example:
A thoughtful approach to diagnostic assessment recognizes that diagnostic systems evolve, that people change, and that no manual can fully capture human complexity.
This looks like a mental health provider:

When diagnoses are imposed without collaboration, they can feel alienating. However, when they are explored together—curiously, gently, and with respect—they can become tools for self-understanding rather than sources of shame.
Meaning is not something a diagnosis gives you. It’s something you build with it, and a great psychiatrist and therapist can support you in this process.
At Existential Psychiatry, diagnoses are approached as one part of a much larger human story. If you’re seeking answers or want a psychiatrist who views you as a whole and complex individual, Dr. David Zacharias approaches diagnostic assessment with nuance, care, and depth. If you have questions or would like to begin services, please reach out for a free consultation.
Written by Existential Psychiatry Staff